June 4, 2008
Somewhat keyed off of Cam’s observations with Joe in Chronicles, I thought I’d throw in something I noticed in Genesis.
The text is Genesis 14:14. The context is the beginning of the Abrahamic covenant (Gen. 12:1-9), Abraham’s apparent disobedient journey into Egypt (Gen. 12:10-20, note God’s silence, and Ishmael’s Egyptian mother Hagar), his seperation from Lot (Gen 13), Lot’s capture, Abraham’s intervention and the defeat of his enemies, including the incident with Melchizedek (Gen 14).
In the middle of this last event, the author and/or compiler of the Torah throws in a reference that is totally out of place. As Abraham is beginning his pursuit of Lot and his captors, Genesis 14:14 says this:
“When Abram heard that his nephew had been taken captive, he mobilized his 318 trained men who had been orn in his household, and he pursued hte invaders as far as Dan.”
On the face of it, there is not too much that appears out of place about this description, except for the mention of Dan, which has no place in the text. Dan the person is still two generations from birth (Gen. 30). Dan the tribe is still many years from being established to a significant level (Exodus). And finally, Dan in its northern location has yet many hundreds of years in the coming (they were originally allotted land in the southeast, but eventually moved to the north because they couldn’t take the land; Josh 19:40-48; Judges 18:27-29).
So what in the world is the author of Genesis doing with the insertion of such an apparent anachronistic reference in th emiddle os his story?
May 6, 2008
As I read through the early chapters of I Kings I cannot help but notice the varying perspective discrepacies which seem to be littered across the Solomonic landscape. As a reader I find myself repeatedly asking, “Who is endorsing this message?” I want the uber-clear statement of today’s political ads: “My name is Yahweh and I approved this message.” Seldom do we hear this message, and I, for one, am left languishing.
The problem, in my estimation can be boiled down to the reticence of the author/narrator to evaluate Solomon’s actions in a number of spheres. Here are a sampling of the place I find Solomon’s actions to be either ambiguous or outright wrong:
- I Kings 2:24 Solomon views God as having established him on the throne “and established dynasty for me as he promised”–did God promise that?
- I Kings 3:1 “Solomon made an alliance my marriage with Pharaoh, king of Egypt; he married Pharaoh’s daughter”–Dt. 17:16
- I Kings 3:3-4 In the key passage where Solomon is supposed to have attained wisdom from God the text describes Solomon as going to “the most prominent of the high places”–which is the discrepancy between David and Solomon cited in I Kings 3:3.
- I Kings 3:5 God appears to Solomon…in a dream. Reliable source or no? (note especially the beginning of I Kings 3:15) This is the only time from Joshua through Kings where a dream carries God’s authority (except I Sam. 28 where Saul is expecting God to speak through dreams).
- If the previous is cast doubtfully, the I Kings 3:15 must also be so for the people “realized that [Solomon] possessed supernatural wisdom…”
- I Kings 4:26 Horses. Dt. 17:16 clearly states that the king should not accumulate horses for himself. The question is at this point is, “Is Solomon ‘accumulating horses’?”
- I Kings 5:5 Was God’s original promise which Solomon is quoting (II Sam 7:13) really about the Temple or about dynasty? In my reading the answer to this question is put in doubt by divine statement in 6:11-13 (“As for this temple you are building…”)–which happens to be God’s first input on the project, and comes just before Solomon finishes the building (Begging the question: Did God have a say in the matter?)
- I Kings 6:38-7:1 Why does Solomon’s house take almost twice as long to build as the Temple?
- I Kings 8:24 Solomon views his temple as fulfillment of God’s promise–the narrator never statedly agrees (that I recall)
- I Kings 8:56 Of course therea are promises made through Moses which were unfulfilled at this point! (unless Solomon views himself as the Messiah!)
- I Kings 9:28 Solomon is accumulating gold…(Dt. 17:17)
- I Kings 10:14-11:5 Finally, the clearest statement in all of Kings against Solomon list his rebellion in deafening clarity against the clear backdrop of the kingly description of Dt 17 . Ouch.
How am I intended to view Solomon? What is the interplay between Solomon’s self-portrayal, the people’s perception, YHWH’s decrees and the author’s portrayal? As far as I can tell the author of I Kings has chosen to tell a somewhat mixed story of this Son of David…Why?
Further study: What of Solomon’s career does YHWH endorse?